13 research outputs found
Privacy Preserving Internet Browsers: Forensic Analysis of Browzar
With the advance of technology, Criminal Justice agencies are being
confronted with an increased need to investigate crimes perpetuated partially
or entirely over the Internet. These types of crime are known as cybercrimes.
In order to conceal illegal online activity, criminals often use private
browsing features or browsers designed to provide total browsing privacy. The
use of private browsing is a common challenge faced in for example child
exploitation investigations, which usually originate on the Internet. Although
private browsing features are not designed specifically for criminal activity,
they have become a valuable tool for criminals looking to conceal their online
activity. As such, Technological Crime units often focus their forensic
analysis on thoroughly examining the web history on a computer. Private
browsing features and browsers often require a more in-depth, post mortem
analysis. This often requires the use of multiple tools, as well as different
forensic approaches to uncover incriminating evidence. This evidence may be
required in a court of law, where analysts are often challenged both on their
findings and on the tools and approaches used to recover evidence. However,
there are very few research on evaluating of private browsing in terms of
privacy preserving as well as forensic acquisition and analysis of privacy
preserving internet browsers. Therefore in this chapter, we firstly review the
private mode of popular internet browsers. Next, we describe the forensic
acquisition and analysis of Browzar, a privacy preserving internet browser and
compare it with other popular internet browser
Optogenetic stimulation of a hippocampal engram activates fear memory recall
A specific memory is thought to be encoded by a sparse population of neurons. These neurons can be tagged during learning for subsequent identification3 and manipulation. Moreover, their ablation or inactivation results in reduced memory expression, suggesting their necessity in mnemonic processes. However, the question of sufficiency remains: it is unclear whether it is possible to elicit the behavioural output of a specific memory by directly activating a population of neurons that was active during learning. Here we show in mice that optogenetic reactivation of hippocampal neurons activated during fear conditioning is sufficient to induce freezing behaviour. We labelled a population of hippocampal dentate gyrus neurons activated during fear learning with channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) and later optically reactivated these neurons in a different context. The mice showed increased freezing only upon light stimulation, indicating light-induced fear memory recall. This freezing was not detected in non-fear-conditioned mice expressing ChR2 in a similar proportion of cells, nor in fear-conditioned mice with cells labelled by enhanced yellow fluorescent protein instead of ChR2. Finally, activation of cells labelled in a context not associated with fear did not evoke freezing in mice that were previously fear conditioned in a different context, suggesting that light-induced fear memory recall is context specific. Together, our findings indicate that activating a sparse but specific ensemble of hippocampal neurons that contribute to a memory engram is sufficient for the recall of that memory. Moreover, our experimental approach offers a general method of mapping cellular populations bearing memory engrams.RIKEN Brain Science InstituteNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant R01-MH078821)National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant P50-MH58880